Your revenue and Buyer Personas, Buyer Journeys, the Buying Process, and Buyer Scenario


Comments (12)
Share:

Buyer Personas have become standard website design tools. Good. Creating them helps everyone in the company understand better who buyers are and what they want. Of course, the personas must be created by interviewing real customers, or they will not be accurate - which will defeat the whole purpose. Guessing or assuming is a big mistake.

On top of that, Buyer Personas can also get in the way. I don't need some seller to tell me who I am or force me to "select myself" before I can access their product or service. If I walked into a store and was forced to answer questions about the "category" I fall into before I was allowed to shop, I would turn on a heel and leave.

That's what happens when someone like Dell forces you to select "Home," Small and Medium Business," "Public Sector," or "Large Enterprise." What if I am a home-based business? Which category do I pick?

Or Verizon, which also forces you to decide if you are "Wireless," "Residential," or "Business." What if I use my cell phone as my office phone for my home-based business? I'd fall into all three categories!

These classifications are all based on the way these companies are organized - and the way they want to sell, rather than the way I want to buy. This is the Buyer Persona concept taking over and messing everything up. Ironically, above these three categories, Verizon asks: "Welcome. What can we help you with today?" Duh. How about "Buying a cell phone"? Or, "Signing up for data service," (which I'll use for both business and personal communication)? How do I do that from this screen?

Because Buyer Personas are relatively easy to create, they are used improperly. If you look at what's really happening when someone is trying to buy something, they are looking for something that you provide. They know what they want, and are hoping you have it. They simply want to see that thing, as quickly as possible. It's your job to get the heck out of the way and serve it up. They don't want your excitement about categorizing your customers impeding their progress.

I think Buyer Personas are great for creating and organizing content you make available to prospects (such as a white paper aimed at top management), but not for organizing the website.

The Buyer Journey is the current catch phrase for what I refer to as the Buying Process in Roadmap to Revenue.

I've been calling it the Buying Process for years, because that's what customers call it. "Buyer Journey" is just plain stupid. It's just another one of those pretentious, "I'm so smart" phrases that goo-roos come up with to sound important. It reminds me of relationship marketing, which was one of the biggest lies ever foisted on CEOs and entrepreneurs. Consultants found it easy to sell business owners on having a "relationship" with buyers. Buyers hated the idea!

Buyers do not go on "journeys." The last thing you want is a "journey" when you set out to buy something. You just want to find it, like it, buy it, and go on with your life.

Howard Gossage once said (paraphrasing), if people talked to each other like they do in commercials, someone would get their lights punched out. Ditto for this phrase. I've interviewed thousands of buyers, and never once has anyone said, "When I started on my buyer journey," or even, "When I started my journey."

The Buying Process is even more important than the Buyer Persona, because it is more closely tied to what the customer actually wants to do when they come to your site. It's the key to understanding how they buy, and then making it easy for them to carry out that process.

The customer's Buying Process starts with the initial need, and continues all the way through to purchase, use, and feedback on the product or service. It's the buyer's "funnel," if you will, where they start out searching, narrow down their choices, try to get all their questions answered, make a selection, buy and experience the product or service, and then share that experience with other potential customers.

All of this involves interaction with your sites, your content, and your people. That's why the Persona concept can't take you to the bank. What you do - or don't do - is more important to your success than who your buyers are. Which brings us to the pinnacle of these concepts, the Buyer Scenario.

The Buyer Scenario is a term I coined to describe the experience that the buyer is hoping to have when looking for, evaluating, purchasing, and then using your product or service.

For example, when we start to buy a new car, in spite of our experience to the contrary, we imagine narrowing our choices online, going to several car dealers to test drive the finalists, then ordering or driving away with just the car we want. We imagine the car dealer answering all of our questions, honestly and efficiently. We imagine the test drive unspoiled by a chattering, boring dealer. We hope against hope that the dealer won't play silly negotiating games when it's time to sign the contract. This is the desired Buyer Scenario.

Another example: Buying software. We want to enter a term into a search engine, see the software that meets those requirements, see a bunch of screen shots so we can pick the one that looks best to us, download a fully functional trial, and find that the software is intuitive and straightforward. We want to buy without a hassle, clicking on a "buy now" button up in the Help drop-down, go to a site where we buy and get a receipt, on screen, that we can copy and paste into a registration box. This is what we hope will happen.

The reality, of course, seldom, if ever, meets these high - but not unreasonable - expectations. I won't even talk about what happens at the car dealer; we've all been through those disgusting experiences and would rather not think about them.

As for software, just recently I tried to buy a program and ran into all kinds of problems as I tried to live out my Buyer Scenario. After I paid, using PayPal, I wasn't taken back to the site so I could finalize the purchase - nor was I given a way to do that on the PayPal screen. And the registration number wasn't included in the PayPal receipt or the emailed receipt. Long story short, I ended up having to contact the company via a hard-to-find email web form to finalize the registration process - and, given that I was trying to buy the product on a Saturday, I had to wait two days before I could finish.

This sort of fiasco is far too common, especially when there are wonderful examples out there of "how to do it right." SproutSocial, a fantastic social media dashboard program, is one such example. Everything is crystal clear. It was a pleasure to sign up and it has been a real pleasure to use.


 
Whaddya know! There's a screen shot on their home page! And a Big Orange Start my Free Trial button. Plus, I see they handle multiple social media channels. So many questions answered, in a very small space, and I can do everything and anything I came here to do, quickly.

Click on Start My Free Trial, and this is what you see. Yes, there are two categories here. But these are product categories, not "buyer persona" categories. I can spend $9 a month and get the basics, or $48 a month and get all these extras. I can quickly decide which way I want to go. My questions are answered. Fast.

Signing up is ridiculously easy, and I love that friendly little message at the top of the sign-in form. Note that they are not asking for more information than they need.

Have you interviewed your current customers to find out what their desired Buyer Scenario looks like? Have you made sure that your website and marketing/selling process makes that Buyer Scenario come true - every single time?

There is a competitive advantage available to you, if you do this better than your competition.
 

Tagged with:

Comments

Buyer Personas - The Right View

Hello Kristin,

I found your article quite interesting. After spending a few years at the origins of personas, I founded Goal Centric and created the Buyer Persona Development Methodology in 2002 based on the sound principles of persona development used for user design. Buyer personas in general do not "get in the way" if undrstood that they are used not to profile a buyer but to be a platform for informing how to design for ideal experiences. The term scenario - user and buyer - has been a main descriptive component of persona development since the late '90's. Buyer personas are developed to inform buyer strategy as well as to design for ideal buyer experiences. The connection between the two - buyer personas and scenarios - are essential. They have been a staple for user and buyer persona development since the origins of personas. It is unfortunate that in marketing and sales buyer personas has become associated with profiling as opposed to correctly being used as a design and strategy tool.

If done properly with the requisite level of ethnographic and qualitative research, buyer personas are not easy to create as you state they are. It takes rigor and behavioral analysis techniques common to ethnography and anthroplogy to craft an accurate buyer persona. If done to just paint a profile of a supposed buyers and created under this misguided context, then that is easy to create and should be called buyer profiles and not buyer personas.

I tend to agree with you that buyer's do not think of their processes as "journey's". I also have discovered, via qualitative research over that last few years, that buyer's are more focused on the buyer/buying experience and not so much on the buying process. The buyer experience has become even more paramount of a focus for it is the outcome of creating ideal buyer scenarios. Buyer scenario - like buyer journey - are seller terms that buyers do not use. However, buyers do talk about their experiences and in today's social age it has become one of the fundamental criterias by which buyers ultimately based decisions upon.

While Verizon and Dell structure by their business divisions, I do see how Sprout Social makes it an easy sign up experience abeit it is a less complex situation than Verizon and Dell face. However, I would still characterize the site as a heavily emphaisized product/features site accompanied by the usual cliche sayings of benefits.

If buyer personas are researched and created correctly, seen as a design tool, created in the context of using a tool like scenarios to design ideal buyer experiences, and mapped to buyer goals - then they will not "get in the way" as you mentioned.

Tony Zambito
President and CEO
Goal Centric
Blog: www.buyerpersonainsights.com

All good points

Hi, Tony.
Nicely composed.
 
You are so right when you say that personas don't get in the way when they are used to support the buyer's experience, rather than simply serve as a profiling tool. As for being easy to create, you said it better than I did, by calling those not-really-personas "profiles." Good.
 
Too many people confuse "profiles" with "personas," and also make too many assumptions, even about the profile. I remember Derrith Lambka making a speech where she asked us to close our eyes and imagine a single mother, with two children. I think she may have said, "Living off the government," but that just may be the way I'd like to remember it. Of course you can guess the person we had imagined. Then she asked us to open our eyes, and up on the screen was a picture of Princess Di. Not a single one of us was thinking it was Lady Di!
 
Profiles - and certainly personas - created without real-life input are just about as far from reality as the person we were imagining and Lady Di.
 
I like the way you use the word "experience." The only reason I use "scenario" instead is to distinguish it from "experience." To me, "experience" is what really happens; the "scenario" (at least, the way I'm using it) is what the buyer is hoping will happen.
 
Agree also that Verizon and Dell have a more complex story than SproutSocial, but I still contend that SproutSocial makes it easy to DO something when you come to the site, in spite of the features/benefits emphasis. I am there to see what they offer and make a decision, and they really make that easy.
 
Of course I agree with your closing statemment.
 
I am so glad you commented. I am really enjoying reading your articles at http://www.buyerpersonainsights.com.
 
Thanks
kz

Persona-based websites are always a bad idea

I agree completely with your assessment of these websites Kristin. When people ask me for examples of a good "persona-based" website I tell them that any website that looks like it relies on personas is a bad website. The goal of buyer personas is to inform a strategy that enables the buying process, full stop. If the folks at Verizon had done real persona work, they would never have that navigation on their website.

I'm concerned about the part of this post where you said that buyer personas are "relatively easy to create." Any "easy" buyer persona is a waste of time, capturing obvious information that is readily available to every competitor.

And I'm concerned that you described the buying process / experience as separate from buyer personas.

A good buyer persona captures four categories of insights about the buyer's purchase of a specific type of product:

- The buying process
- Their decision criteria
- Their perceived barriers
- Their success factors

Only the fifth insight is not product-specific -- the priority initiatives insight tells the marketer where this type of buyer is investing their time, budget and political capital (B2B buyers).

In addition, most marketers don't go deep enough on these insights -- capturing information like "we lost because we were most expensive" when a more skilled interview would uncover really useful, non-obvious information.

The terminology and scope of buyer personas is confusing everyone and could interfere with the outcome that we all agree is urgently required -- helping companies change the marketing culture and skill set to include the discovery and application of buyer insights.

I recently published an ebook that describes the scope of buyer personas http://bit.ly/lqEo7B. I would love to get your feedback Kristin.

Going deep

Hey, Adele -
 
So nice to hear from you. Always respected your work for Pragmatic Marketing.
 
I have downloaded your ebook. I will read it this week and get back to you, but I also wanted to address your comments.
 
When I mentioned that personas are relatively easy to create, what I meant is that it is too easy to create them lazily - using assumptions rather than real research. Based on Tony's comments and yours, while this is what I meant, I surely didn't convey it properly. I did say earlier that ". . . the personas must be created by interviewing real customers, or they will not be accurate - which will defeat the whole purpose. Guessing or assuming is a big mistake."
 
When I talked about how easy it is to create them, I should have said, "It's too easy to create inaccurate ones - just by guessing." Something like that. Actually, buyer personas suffer from the same thing that ALL marketing suffers from - assumptions based on something other than solid qualitative research.
 
What you are describing - the five points - is very much in line with what I talk about in my book. We're coming into the same room through a different door. I wrote my book for the entrepreneur and CEO, not the marketer, although marketers are loving the book. My goal was to present marketing for what it really is - an interaction between a customer and a company - including that company's website, people, products, services, service, processes, and even policies. The most succesful companies understand that the customer is trying to DO something - and they make that easy.
 
Thanks for your comment. Very insightful. I look forward to reading your ebook.
kz

Great Insights

Kristin,
Very nice post. I agree that personas should be evidence-based and shouldn't get in the way of the buying process. Loved the Social Sprout example too. Very nice.
Thanks,
Jared Bodnar
Loop Demand Gen
www.loopdemandgen.com

Who should interview my clients?

Kristin,

is it better to interview our own clients or hire a 3rd party to do it for us? My concern is that we will make assumptions during the interview process or we might accidentally assist in our client's answers.

What do you recommend?

Thank you,
Jordan Krizman
360 Cloud Solutions

Who should interview clients - answer

Hi, Jordan. Well, my first recommendation is to buy my book. I literally spell out exactly how to interview clients, yourself, down to the best way to contact them and set up the appointment, what questions to ask, what to do with the information, and more. All very straightforward and prescriptive. I have not left anything out of the book.
 
I also say in the book, however, that your customers will tell a third party more than they will tell you. It's not so much that you may assist them, but that they will hold back, out of politeness. And those very valuable, honest, straight-from-the-gut phrases that are so important to the success of your future marketing efforts will be watered down.
 
I'm often hired to conduct these interviews, but after I do the first round, I do everything I can to help companies continue to do the interviews themselves going forward. The company's marketers make the best interviewers. The salespeople should not conduct the interviews. It is impossible for a salesperson to "interview" without "selling," and it's impossible for a customer to talk to a salesperson without assuming that he is going to pounce any moment.
 
When I interview customers for my clients, I tell the customers that their comments will go into a report that is categorized by subject, so it is completely anonymous. That helps them open up without reservation, and I also keep my promise. I do not attribute comments to individuals. Instead, the report shows all of the answers to a given question in one section. This has the added advantage of organizing the information for top managers; they can see all of the comments on a given subject and see the trend for themselves.
 
Does that help?
 
kz

Missing the point?

KZ -

I know we've had this discussion before, but I think you're missing the point about personas (though arguably most of the people who think they're creating personas make the same mistakes).

Personas are, in essence, a way of thinking about *behavior*. Not demographics, not "annual revenue potential," not Dell's business segments or Verizon's useless plan ownership or any other marker. Just behavior.

Pretty clearly, your personal buying behavior is a rational, no-nonsense approach. You're very focused on tangibles, on benefits, on how smoothly the process works.

But other people have other behavioral profiles. Some are very brand loyal, for example. Some put a premium on being an early adopter. Some value the personal chemistry with the sales person very highly. Some are risk-averse types who worry about making a wrong decision. Etc. The buying process that wins with the "Kristin" persona will probably flop with most of these other types.

Your car example actually underscores this point. Clever car sales people are (in theory) trained to recognize "types" and to handle these people in ways that fit the buyer's behavioral style. For instance, the early adopter will probably be shown sexy options--the GPS, special engine technology, and so forth. The risk-averse buyer will be told about Consumer Reports ratings, resale value, warranties, etc.

In fact, one car rental company--Enterprise?--actually did a big survey project to identify key personas in their customer base, and then looked at ways to make sure they had a strong value proposition for each of these groups. In some cases, they chose not to pursue a persona that was more trouble than its profit potential could justify (e.g., it cost too much to have cars with the latest GPS technology on hand, and these renters weren't brand loyal in any case). But for most of the segments, they ended up doing exactly what you recommend-- find out which buyers are "looking for something that you provide" and deliver it.

Yes, it's hard to do this right, especially for mass-market companies.

But if you aren't thinking about the diversity of customer behavioral types, I'll bet you're losing a lot of sales.

Missing the point - response

Strange to read your comment, because I agree with every word of it. Perhaps I should be doing a follow-up article that says, "Part of what you will find out with properly conducted customer research is WHAT/WHO those real personas are."
 
My problem, and I would have talked about it, but the article was already pretty long, was that people THINK they know the personas. They make them up. That's why it's "easy." Because they're doing it wrong.
 
Proper research will clearly identify these types and their real-life behaviors and preferences.
 
Anyway, thanks, and always nice to hear from you.
 
kz

Thanks for mentioning Sprout Social!

Thanks. Kristin, for noticing the thoughtful work the team put into giving our potential customers the experience they can expect when they use Sprout Social.

Its pretty entertaining to "read" your thoughts as you are going through the process. I'm pretty sure those ideas were what the design/sales team hopes our users have going through their heads.

Thanks again, Kristin.

Tessa Auza
Community Manager, Sprout Social, Inc.

Thanks!

Hi Kristin,

Wanted to thank you for your kind words on our process. That process in particular as part of our overall process gives me fits! Always trying to weigh how to make it useful and logical - which can be hard with software that serves different audiences.

Sometimes we're tempted to ask the user to self-select. but we've found the user won't know until they really get in and see it - so let's give them what they need to make a choice and go from there. I struggle with it so much, it was a pleasure seeing that you enjoyed it!

We're considering moving to a full-featured single trial and not requiring the user to choose at all until afterwards, but that has some challenges of it's own.

Appreciate the mention and very much appreciate you as a Sprout Social user :)

Justyn Howard
CEO
Sprout Social, Inc.

Hey, Justyn.

Nice to hear from you - the CEO of Sprout Social, no less. That says something about Sprout Social. I have referred so many people to you.
 
I have tried the other dashboards and they aren't even in the same league as SproutSocial. The perfect tool for the busy business owner, in particular, who simply doesn't have time to use anything else. It has really revolutionized my ability to do social media the way I think I should be doing social media.
 
Congratulations on a job well done.
 
kz

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

 

Zhivago Management Partners, Inc
381 Seaside Drive, Jamestown, RI 02835 USA
Kristin@Zhivago.com  401-423-2400
© 2004 - 2012 Zhivago Management Partners, Inc.
Revenue Journal is a registered trademark of Zhivago Management Partners, Inc.