Pitiful pitches

By Kristin Zhivago on Mar 16, 2007

I get a lot of calls from PR folks. Each call is a sales call, which is why I'm talking about it here. Anyone who sells for a living - and that includes CEOs and entrepreneurs - can learn from the mistakes that PR houses make. This article will also help you manage your PR folks, who are probably making these same mistakes.

PR people call me because they have a story they want me to "buy" and write about. Their methods, for the most part, are pitiful. It's sad, because just about every person who calls is a decent human being who wants to do a good job.

Most of the calls come from young females who have been hired to call editors, reporters, and bloggers and try to line up an appointment with the company's CEO. They must all attend the same school of Dysfunctional PR, because they all say the same thing:

Hi, my name is Jennifer. I'm calling because XYZ company is rolling out a new widget. Did you get my press release? Would you like to interview the CEO?

I'm sad to say that they've been saying this same thing to me since 1984, when my monthly columns started appearing in a marketing magazine. After hearing the same pitiful pitch for 23 years now, it would be easy to be impatient and cross. But I was young and in PR once, so I try to help them.

More often than not, they refuse to be helped. Why? Because they are so ashamed of what they're doing that they can't wait to get off the phone. Any excuse, even the hint of a rejection, confirms their worst fears. This editor hates me and can't wait for me to get off the phone. I'd better say goodbye now.

I try to help by asking them about the product. "OK, slow down. Before we talk about interviewing your CEO, let's talk about what you're rolling out and why it's significant."

Most of them stumble at this point. There's usually a dead silence for a few awkward seconds. They honestly can't answer this basic question. This is pitiful! They don't understand what they're pitching. All they know is, they're supposed to call an editor after the press releases are blasted out, and try to secure an interview with the CEO.

Somehow their training doesn't include an actual conversation with an editor. It's as if they're hired to "pitch" a neighborhood - by running up to each house, ringing the doorbell, yelling what they're supposed to be yelling, and then turning and running to the next house. If someone were to actually answer the door and start asking them questions, they wouldn't know what to do. That's exactly what happens when PR people call.

PR people still call me because they want to talk to the editor of Marketing Technology, a newsletter I wrote from 1991 to 2004. I tell them I'm not writing it anymore, and, no, no one else is here who can help them, because I wrote everything in Marketing Technology. Then I explain that I'm now writing this blog, and my audience is mostly CEOs and entrepreneurs. Quite often, what they're pitching could be interesting to my current readers.

But all they know is, I'm not writing what they thought I was writing. Their brains shut down. "Oh. I see. You're not writing Marketing Technology anymore. OK, thank you. Bye." Another opportunity, blown.

What salespeople - and PR people - need to do

Instead of being taught how to recite pitches, salespeople should be taught how to listen and to think.

Ah, this editor doesn't write Marketing Technology anymore, but instead writes a blog for entrepreneurs and CEOs. But she's still covering marketing and selling. Hmmm. Maybe I should find out more about the Revenue Journal, to see if it's right for my client's story. I'll tell this editor about this product and then ask if her audience might be interested in it.

Instead of running away, the listening and thinking PR person could say, "OK, I understand, you're writing a blog called the Revenue Journal. What is the URL? [Goes there.] Uh-huh. Yes, I see. Hmmm. Yes, I see what you write about. Well, you might be interested in this product. It is a [describes it in 3 - 4 sentences]. Would that interest your readers?"

This conversation is now going somewhere. We are discussing the client's product. The PR person has taken a moment to understand what I write about, and is telling me something that will help me decide if the subject would be interesting to my readers. All good sales calls are two-way conversations, not a one-way speech.

I am sorry to say that for every 100 PR calls I get, only one of them leads to coverage. If PR people were really pitching properly, I could imagine that percentage increasing to 10 or 20%.

Are your salespeople listening and thinking? Do they actually hear what the person says and then figure out how to work with that response, in a way that makes sense to the customer and could even result in a sale? Have you helped to teach them how to have actual conversations?

Or, are they ringing the doorbell, yelling their pitch, and then running away?



See related articles on Bloopers | Elevator pitch | How Customers Buy | How to be a better salesperson | Increasing revenue | Sales Pitches | Selling | Selling software | Successful selling | Tools for your sales force

Previous article: Charm is not a strategy

Next article: Where have all the good designers gone?

Archive of all Revenue Journal articles



Comments

Good article. I wonder whether it would be better not to send out the release first but to target the 2or 3 pubs which are locgical places for an article so the pr rep has to know the subject or would not be able to place the call.......that is what I try to do for clients when I have my publicity hat on.
Wilder Baker

Posted by: wilder baker on March 16, 2007 5:57 PM




Having been one of the marketing VPs who hire such PR agencies, I have to say that I absolutely agree. When the experienced and tech-savvy founder of the agency has won XYZ company's business, the account is handed over to a couple of 20-somethings with journalism or fine arts degrees whose job it is to sell a CEO interview to editors. Not only do they lack both product knowledge and the understanding of the inherent technology to communicate its points of difference, but they don't know how to sell.

Worse still, many of them can't write English. let alone compelling copy. Hence the turgid technobabble of so many press releases. My current favorite:
"XXX helps organizations intelligently leverage technology to improve their business by providing affordable customized software development solutions that increase the efficiency and effectiveness of people, operations and sales efforts and allow better visibility into and control over the business."

My conclusion is that most tech companies need to be extremely selective in their choice of PR agency, get proof of their writing skills and the quality of their relationships with the technical press, and manage them closely.

Posted by: Chris on March 16, 2007 7:48 PM




Good article, Kristin. The sad thing is that nothing you write comes as a surprise to me. The criticisms and frustrations you share are some of the most common general complaints I hear from reporters. (I am a vice president at a PR agency and president of the Public Relations Society of America's Boston Chapter).

Effective public relations is grounded in solid research. Not knowing the focus of a publication or a writer is inexcusable. If a PR person can't articulate the benefits of what they are discussing and why it matters to the media and the people who are reading what the reporter writes - they should not be speaking with the media.

You are being too nice in your post. "Did you get my press release?" is possibly one of the two worst questions you can ask (tied with "Are you busy?"). While I would argue that good PR people aren't just 1%, your points are something that every PR professional should keep in mind.


Posted by: Mark W. McClennan, APR on March 19, 2007 9:52 AM




Thanks for your tips. I am that young female PR girl who would rather poke myself in the eye than pitch something (especially when I wasn't properly briefed on the client). I hope to do better in the future.

Posted by: Meredith on March 19, 2007 4:40 PM




The image of ringing the bell and running away is priceless.

It's a vicious cycle of clip counting and poor pitches, and the PR agencies are not entirely to blame. I have been on both sides of the fence, and as well as the VP in between a product-oriented CEO who just couldn't understand why version 3.4 wasn't huge news and the agency saying how can we pitch this old thing. And me in the middle trying to figure out some way, any way to make something happen.

There are however creative solutions to the problem, if we are willing to look.

Posted by: Susan Getgood on March 19, 2007 6:42 PM






Post a comment




Remember Me?


If you like my blog, you'll love my book
You can suffer through years of marketing and selling experimentation, or you can read this book and understand exactly what you have to do.

Guy Kawasaki author of The Art of the Start

Kristin Zhivago - smartest technology marketing person - ever! I've been in technology sales and marketing for over twenty years. I'm here to tell you that I am completely blown away by her complete command of the issues. Do your career a favor and read everything she has ever written.

Mitsu Fisher Inside Sales Professional Kudos Information Ltd.

Loved your book!!!!

Bill Harrison FreePublicity.com

Zhivago's book will forever change the way you think about marketing.

Anneliese Kellner Global Marketing Manager Kudos Information Ltd.

Subscribe to Revenue Journal

I post a new article here every Friday. To receive a weekly email containing the article, enter your email address:

We will NEVER rent, share, sell, trade, or otherwise transfer your email address to ANYONE. Period. You can unsubscribe here.

  • AddThis Feed Button
  • AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Revenue Journal Archives

List of all Articles

Make a Suggestion or
Pitch KZ